Monitoring Architecture Distribution
by
Raman Kazhamiakin
—
last modified
Jul 13, 2011 13:40
—
filed under:
KnowledgeModel
Definitions
| Term: Monitoring Architecture Distribution |
Domain: Cross-cutting issues | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering and Design (KM-ED) |
Adaptation and Monitoring (KM-AM) |
Quality Definition, Negotiation and
Assurance (KM-QA) |
Generic (domain independent) |
||
| D o m a i n : L a y e r s |
Business Process Management (KM-BPM) |
||||
| Service Composition and
Coordination (KM-SC) |
|||||
| Service Infrastructure (KM-SI) |
The distribution of a Grid monitoring system's actors falls
into one of four categories:
|
||||
| Generic (domain independent) |
A characteristic of the monitoring architecture that
defines how the components of the framework are logically and
physically located. In case of distributed architectures, the
components are placed on a separate remote platforms and collaborate
with each other in order to evaluate certain property over the
monitored SBA. In
case of centralized architectures, the monitoring framework
represents a centralized component that is physically co-located with
the information sources and overlooks
the application execution. [CD-JRA-1.2.2] |
||||
Competencies
- UniDue: Software Architecture; http://www.sse.uni-due.de/wms/en/?go=108; Klaus Pohl, Andreas Metzger, Kim Lauenroth
- UniDue: Quality Assurance; http://www.sse.uni-due.de/wms/en/?go=111;
Klaus Pohl, Andreas Metzger
- TBD
Scenarios
TBD
References
- [CD-JRA-1.2.2] Taxonomy of adaptation principles and mechanisms
- [Zanikolas, 2004] S. Zanikolas and R. Sakellariou. A Taxonomy of
Grid Monitoring Systems. Future Generation Computer Systems,
21(2005):163–188, October 2004.
