Failure Semantics
by
Benedikt Liegener
—
last modified
Sep 07, 2011 12:32
—
filed under:
QualityAttribute,
KnowledgeModel
Definitions
| Term: Failure Semantic |
Domain: Cross-cutting issues | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering and Design (KM-ED) |
Adaptation and Monitoring (KM-AM) |
Quality Definition, Negotiation and
Assurance (KM-QA) |
Generic (domain independent) |
||
| D o m a i n : L a y e r s |
Business Process Management (KM-BPM) |
Failure Semantic consists of capabilities designed to
handle failure in a business
process |
A Failure can be defined as a disability of a business process in terms of providing
its desired KPIs |
||
| Service Composition and
Coordination (KM-SC) |
Failure Semantic is a set of description that is
designed to identify failure situations and how to react such a failure in a
composite service |
An adaptation
mechanism could be applied to remove the failure |
A Failure can be defined as a disability of a service
in providing the required non-functional requirements |
||
| Service Infrastructure (KM-SI) |
A Failure can be defined as a disability of a service
to perform its performance requirements [CD-JRA-2.3.4]
[CD-JRA-1.2.4] |
||||
| Generic (domain independent) |
Failure Semantics describe the general
capabilities of a service to handle failures. In particular, they
describe the circumstances of service failures and how a service reacts
to failures. [CD-JRA-1.3.2] {GEN: Dependability} |
||||
Competencies
-
UniDue: Quality Assurance; http://www.sse.uni-due.de/wms/en/?go=111; Klaus Pohl, Andreas Metzger
- POLIMI: Adaptive Web Services; http://home.dei.polimi.it/pernici/ws-research.html;
Barbara Pernici, Anna Maria Rosati
Scenarios
TBD
References
- [CD-JRA-1.3.2] "Quality reference model for service-based applications"
- [CD-JRA-2.3.4] CD-JRA-2.3.4: Decision support for local adaptation
- [CD-JRA-1.2.4] CD-JRA-1.2.4: Integrated adaptation and monitoring principles, techniques and methodologies across functional SBA layers
