Configuration-Related Quality
by
Benedikt Liegener
—
last modified
Aug 03, 2009 10:16
—
filed under:
KnowledgeModel
Definitions
| Term: Configuration-Related Quality |
Domain: Cross-cutting issues | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering and Design (KM-ED) |
Adaptation and Monitoring (KM-AM) |
Quality Definition, Negotiation and
Assurance (KM-QA) |
Generic (domain independent) |
||
| D o m a i n : L a y e r s |
Business Process Management (KM-BPM) |
||||
| Service Composition and
Coordination (KM-SC) |
|||||
| Service Infrastructure (KM-SI) |
|||||
| Generic (domain independent) |
This quality group/category contains quality attributes that influence the way a service is configured to function (service level [Sabata et al. 1997]) or characterize if the promised functional and quality level has been actually delivered during the service’s lifetime period (completeness, stability, reputation). [CD-JRA-1.3.2] {GEN: Quality Attribute} {SPC: Stability, Change Cycle, Completeness, Reputation, Level of Service} | ||||
Competencies
- TBD
Scenarios
TBD
References
- [CD-JRA-1.3.2] "Quality reference model for service-based applications"
- [Sabata et al. 1997] Bikash Sabata, Saurav Chatterjee, Michael
Davis, Jaroslaw J. Sydir, and Thomas F. Lawrence. Taxomomy of qos
specifications. In WORDS ’97: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on
Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems - (WORDS ’97), pages
100–107,Washington, DC, USA, 1997. IEEE Computer Society.
