Compatibility
by
Dragan Ivanovic
—
last modified
Jul 12, 2011 10:49
—
filed under:
KnowledgeModel
Definitions
| Term: Compatibility |
Domain: Cross-cutting issues | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering and Design (KM-ED) |
Adaptation and Monitoring (KM-AM) |
Quality Definition, Negotiation and
Assurance (KM-QA) |
Generic (domain independent) |
||
| D o m a i n : L a y e r s |
Business Process Management (KM-BPM) |
Compatibility denotes the possibility to substitute a business protocol without violating interoperability with other business protocols. [Mancioppi et al. 2008] | |||
| Service Composition and
Coordination (KM-SC) |
Compatibility: a service S1 is fully or partially compatible with another service S2 if all or some of the executions of S1 can interoperate with S2, i.e., any conversation that can be generated by S1 is understood by S2 [Benatallah et al 2006]. | ||||
| Service Infrastructure (KM-SI) |
|||||
| Generic (domain independent) |
|||||
Competencies
- UPM: Multi-Party Business Protocols; http://clip.dia.fi.upm.es; Manuel
Carro
- Tilburg: Business Process Management; http://www.tilburguniversity.nl/eriss/research/; Willem-Jan van den Heuvel, Michele Mancioppi, Mike Papazoglou
Scenarios
TBD
References
- [Mancioppi et al. 2008] Michele Mancioppi, Manuel Carro, Willem-Jan van den Heuvel, and Mike P. Papazoglou. Sound Multi-party Business Protocols for Service Networks. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Service Oriented Computing, LNCS. Springer-Verlag, December 2008.
- [Benatallah et al] Boualem Benatallah, Fabio Casatib and Farouk Toumani, Representing. Analysing and managing Web service protocols. Data & Knowledge Engineering, Volume 58, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages 327-357.
